Impact

Evidence before scale.

One published study anchors our claims. Here is what it measured, what it found, where we fell short and what it cannot tell you.

The study

Home blood collection for Memorial Sloan Kettering patients.

Memorial Sloan Kettering clinicians studied home phlebotomy delivered by myOnsite from 26 September 2022 to 31 December 2023, and published the results in JNCI Cancer Spectrum in 2024.

345

patients

1,464

home collection visits

5,104

specimens collected

0

hemolyzed specimens

Specimen quality against MSK's own benchmarks

Three benchmarks met. One target missed.

IndicatorMSK benchmarkResult
Clotted specimens2%1 of 5,104 (0.02%)
Hemolyzed specimens1%0 of 5,104 (0%)
Mislabeled specimens00 of 5,104
Collection to lab receipt120 minutes245 of 5,104 (4.80%) took longer

Mislabeled

Mislabeled: 0

0 of 5,104 specimens. MSK benchmark: 0.

Unlabeled

Unlabeled: 1

1 of 5,104 specimens (0.02%). Reported by the paper separately from the four benchmarks above.

Source for both figures: Bange et al., JNCI Cancer Spectrum, 2024 (doi:10.1093/jncics/pkae104). Benchmarks were set in advance by MSK's Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.

Where the visits were

Four states.

These are the states where the study's visits took place. They are not a list of where myOnsite operates today. Current service coverage is shown separately below.

New York1,004 visits (68.6%)
New Jersey437 (29.9%)
Connecticut16 (1.1%)
Pennsylvania7 (0.5%)
Patient experience

147 of 149 would use it again or recommend it.

Patients with a home visit between 26 September 2022 and 15 March 2023 were called with one yes-or-no question. Of 173 approached, 149 answered (86%), and 147 (99%) said yes.

Yes147 of 149
Current service coverage

Where myOnsite operates today.

This is current service coverage. It is separate from the four states where the published Memorial Sloan Kettering study took place.

Ask about your ZIP code

30 states

myOnsite operates in 30 states as of October 2026. Coverage inside each state depends on the ZIP code.

Limits the authors state

Read these before the numbers.

  • It took place at one comprehensive cancer center, including its regional network sites across four states.
  • It used one mobile phlebotomy vendor, and quality may vary with vendor selection.
  • It was a quality improvement study, run under an institutional review board waiver of consent.
What it does not show

Claims we do not make from it.

  • Performance for draws from implanted ports
  • Cost savings for the hospital or the patient
  • Results for other cancer centers, other states or other vendors